Qur’anic Root ʿ Ṣ R (ع ص ر)

Discuss this work on Tabsira

ʿAṣr: pressing and extracting juice, whirlwinds, rain-bearing clouds, and the passage of time

Qur’anic forms

1. Introduction and Qur’anic forms

The Arabic root ع ص ر (ʿ ṣ r) has several recognized branches of meaning. عَصَرَ (ʿaṣara) means pressing something to draw out its water or other liquid. عَصْر (ʿaṣr) also denotes time, an age, or part of the day. Within the same family, إِعْصَار (iʿṣār) denotes a whirlwind that lifts windborne dust in a rotating movement, while مُعْصِرَات (muʿṣirāt) occurs in the Qur’an in connection with rainfall.

These meanings belong to one linguistic family, but we should not assume that they all arose from a single original image. The connection between pressing and extracting juice is clear; the connection of time or a whirlwind with that action requires separate examination.

The root occurs five times in the Qur’an: twice as the basic verb عَصَرَ (ʿaṣara), alongside three other forms, عَصْر (ʿaṣr), إِعْصَار (iʿṣār), and مُعْصِرَات (muʿṣirāt). There are thus four morphological categories and five actual word forms in the following list:

  • أَعْصِرُ (aʿṣiru): I press or extract juice; the first-person singular imperfect of the basic verb, in Yūsuf 12:36.
  • يَعْصِرُونَ (yaʿṣirūna): they press or extract juice; a plural imperfect of the basic verb, in Yūsuf 12:49.
  • إِعْصَار (iʿṣār): a whirlwind or strong rotating wind, in Al-Baqarah 2:266.
  • الْمُعْصِرَات (al-muʿṣirāt): in the context of rain, clouds ready to rain or rain-bearing clouds, with other interpretive possibilities, in Al-Nabaʾ 78:14.
  • الْعَصْر (al-ʿaṣr): time, an age, or part of the day, in Al-ʿAṣr 103:1.

Other familiar Arabic forms include عَصِير (ʿaṣīr), juice or a pressed liquid; عُصَارَة (ʿuṣārah), the liquid or extract produced by pressing; مَعْصَرَة (maʿṣarah), a place or implement for pressing; and اعْتِصَار (iʿtiṣār), extracting or obtaining something. These forms do not occur in the Qur’an.

The distinctions between these branches matter. We cannot interpret al-ʿaṣr in the chapter Al-ʿAṣr as “pressing” without evidence, just as iʿṣār in Al-Baqarah is not the name of an operation for extracting fruit juice.

2. Semantic centres in early Arabic

Pressing and drawing out what something contains

In material usage, عَصَرَ (ʿaṣara) denotes pressing something so that water, oil, or another liquid comes out. Pressing grapes for juice and olives for oil are clear examples.

Three elements can be distinguished: the material being pressed, the action of pressing, and the substance that emerges. The verb ʿaṣara expresses the action itself; ʿaṣīr or ʿuṣārah can denote its product.

Arabic lexicons also record names from this family for the implements and places used in pressing. مَعْصَرَة (maʿṣarah) denotes a pressing place or apparatus, and مِعْصَار (miʿṣār) a pressing implement, including a bag in which grapes are pressed. Their presence in dictionaries does not by itself establish that all these terms circulated before the Qur’an.

This usage is connected with agriculture and food production. Grapes, olives, and other materials containing water or oil could be processed through pressing. The meaning was therefore associated with a familiar physical task, rather than being merely an abstract concept.

Arabic also records a proverbial expression meaning “as long as olive oil is pressed.” Ibn al-Sikkīt transmits it in the expression لا أفعله ما دام الزيت يعصر (lā afʿaluhu mā dāma al-zaytu yuʿṣaru): “I will not do it as long as oil is pressed.” It expresses lasting duration through a familiar activity of oil production.

A fragment attributed to Aws ibn Ḥajar, also quoted by Ibn Fāris in his discussion of pressing, reads:

فَلَا بُرْءَ مِنْ ضَبَّاءَ وَالزَّيْتُ يُعْصَرُ

“There is no recovery from [attachment to] Ḍabbāʾ as long as oil is pressed.”

The fragment relies on the actual meaning of oil pressing, but in its poetic setting it expresses enduring attachment and the inability to escape it. It is therefore more than a report about agricultural work. The fragment’s attribution and precise date of composition must also be distinguished from its evidence for the word’s meaning.

From physical pressing to obtaining and extracting

Some forms in this family extend beyond physical pressing. اعْتَصَرَ (iʿtaṣara) can denote obtaining or drawing something out of another person, even when no bodily squeezing is involved.

The semantic connection is recognizable: just as pressing fruit draws out its liquid, obtaining something from a person or source can be expressed through a word from the same family.

This extension should not become an absolute rule. Not every verb for taking, extracting, benefiting, or gaining profit is lexically identical with ʿaṣara. Each form and its actual usage require examination.

ʿAṣr as time and an age

Another branch is عَصْر (ʿaṣr), “time.” In early Arabic it can denote an age, a period, a particular time, or part of the day.

The dual expression العَصْرَان (al-ʿaṣrān) is also recorded. In some usages it denotes night and day, and in others morning and evening.

A verse attributed to Imruʾ al-Qays reads:

أَلَا عِمْ صَبَاحًا أَيُّهَا الطَّلَلُ الْبَالِي
وَهَلْ يَعِمَنْ مَنْ كَانَ فِي الْعُصُرِ الْخَالِي

“A good morning to you, O weathered traces of a dwelling! Yet can one who belonged to the bygone age still enjoy that well-being?”

In this verse, العُصُرِ الْخَالِي (al-ʿuṣuri al-khālī) refers to a bygone age. Lexical transmissions also record the temporal word as العَصْر (al-ʿaṣr), and the opening verb as انعم (inʿim) instead of عم (ʿim). The temporal meaning remains clear in the poetic context.

This witness, attributed to early poetry, illustrates an independent and recognized temporal usage of ʿaṣr. A traditional attribution alone, however, does not establish the exact date of a verse’s composition.

Etymologically, the similarity between عَصْر (ʿaṣr) and the verb عَصَرَ (ʿaṣara) is insufficient to show that time originally meant something “being squeezed.” Such an image may appear in literary writing, but a literary image does not establish a word’s historical origin.

Nor should ʿaṣr always be restricted to the afternoon. Afternoon is one recognized application of the word, not its entire semantic range.

Seeking refuge and holding fast

Lexicons record another branch in this family: عَصَر (ʿaṣar) and عُصْرَة (ʿuṣrah), a refuge or means of escape, and اعْتَصَرَ بِهِ (iʿtaṣara bihi), to take refuge in or resort to something.

Arabic witnesses are also reported for this meaning. Its historical connection with pressing or time is nevertheless neither clear nor undisputed.

In the interpretation preferred here, taking refuge has no direct role in the root’s five Qur’anic occurrences. However, sources also report an interpretation of يَعْصِرُونَ (yaʿṣirūna) in Yūsuf 12:49 as “they find deliverance,” derived from this branch. It should therefore remain on record without being treated as the certain meaning of this verse or the other Qur’anic occurrences.

3. Pressing grapes and the return of abundance in Yūsuf

أَعْصِرُ خَمْرًا (aʿṣiru khamran): pressing what becomes wine

Yūsuf 12:36

وَدَخَلَ مَعَهُ السِّجْنَ فَتَيَانِ ۖ قَالَ أَحَدُهُمَا إِنِّي أَرَانِي أَعْصِرُ خَمْرًا ۖ وَقَالَ الْآخَرُ إِنِّي أَرَانِي أَحْمِلُ فَوْقَ رَأْسِي خُبْزًا تَأْكُلُ الطَّيْرُ مِنْهُ ۖ نَبِّئْنَا بِتَأْوِيلِهِ ۖ إِنَّا نَرَاكَ مِنَ الْمُحْسِنِينَ

“Two young men entered the prison with him. One said, ‘I see myself [in a dream] pressing wine.’ The other said, ‘I see myself carrying bread on my head, from which birds are eating.’ Inform us of its interpretation; indeed, we see you among those who do good.”

Here أَعْصِرُ (aʿṣiru) has its familiar meaning of pressing and extracting liquid.

The expression أَعْصِرُ خَمْرًا (aʿṣiru khamran), however, presents an important linguistic point. What is physically pressed is normally grapes or another ingredient used to prepare a drink, rather than finished wine. Reading khamr here as naming the eventual product is therefore a strong possibility consistent with linguistic usage.

Similarly, someone may say “I extract olive oil,” although the material put under pressure is the olives themselves. The name of the product can stand in place of the raw material.

Here too, “I press wine” stays close to the wording, while “I press grapes to make wine” explains the likely intended meaning more clearly.

Translation and analysis should preserve this distinction. The verb aʿṣiru does not itself mean making wine or causing intoxication. It expresses pressing, while خَمْر (khamr) identifies the intended product.

Conversely, explaining the expression should not lead us to remove khamr from the Arabic text or claim that it certainly means only grapes here. Alongside the explanation that the final product names the raw material, Al-Ṭabarī transmits a report from Al-Ḍaḥḥāk that people in Oman called grapes khamr. This linguistic report records another possibility without establishing an exclusive meaning for the word in this verse.

Later in the story, Joseph interprets the dreams. In Yūsuf 12:41 he tells one prisoner that he will serve wine to his master. That later verse clarifies the connection between the dream and preparing and serving a drink.

The pressing is thus a physical action presented within a dream. Naming the eventual product and the reported regional use of khamr for grapes offer two explanations of the verb’s object.

وَفِيهِ يَعْصِرُونَ (wa-fīhi yaʿṣirūna): hardship ends and production returns

Yūsuf 12:49

ثُمَّ يَأْتِي مِنْ بَعْدِ ذَٰلِكَ عَامٌ فِيهِ يُغَاثُ النَّاسُ وَفِيهِ يَعْصِرُونَ

“Then, after that, a year will come in which the people receive relief and in which they press [produce].”

This verse continues the interpretation of the Egyptian king’s dream. Joseph describes years of abundant crops, followed by years of severe shortage, and finally a year in which people emerge from hardship.

Two linguistic analyses are reported for يُغَاثُ النَّاسُ (yughāthu al-nās): a connection with غ ي ث (gh y th), the arrival of rain, or with غ و ث (gh w th), the arrival of help and deliverance. The first fits the agricultural setting; under the second, rain and renewed fertility can themselves constitute that help. Assigning this form exclusively and certainly to gh w th is therefore inaccurate.

The verse then says وَفِيهِ يَعْصِرُونَ (wa-fīhi yaʿṣirūna): in that year people once again press something and obtain its juice or oil.

The verb’s object is not stated. The Qur’an does not specify grapes, olives, or any other particular crop. Given familiar Arabic usage and the story’s agricultural setting, pressing farm produce, especially grapes and olives, is an appropriate interpretation.

Some early lexical explanations also include milking among the possibilities. Nevertheless, the verb’s direct and usual sense is pressing to draw out liquid; milking should not take precedence without contextual support. Another interpretation connects yaʿṣirūna, “they find deliverance,” with عَصَر / عُصْرَة (ʿaṣar / ʿuṣrah), refuge or escape. Sources transmit and debate that possibility. This study prefers pressing in view of the context of agricultural production.

Among the ten canonical readings, Ḥamzah, Al-Kisāʾī, and Khalaf read تَعْصِرُونَ (taʿṣirūna), addressing a plural audience; the others read يَعْصِرُونَ (yaʿṣirūna) in the third person. The difference is grammatical person: “you press” versus “they press.” The underlying action remains the same.

Reports outside the ten canonical readings attribute the passive يُعْصَرُونَ (yuʿṣarūna) to Al-Aʿraj and Jaʿfar ibn Muḥammad, and تُعْصَرُونَ (tuʿṣarūna) to ʿĪsā ibn ʿUmar. Both receiving rain and finding deliverance are reported as explanations. These transmissions contribute to the lexical discussion, but should not be placed on the same footing as the ten canonical readings or replace yaʿṣirūna in the text studied here.

The connection with Yūsuf 12:36 is noteworthy. One of the first two dreams concerned pressing material to prepare wine; here pressing resumes after years of famine. The action appears in both places, but the contexts and purposes differ.

In verse forty-nine, pressing signals the renewed ability to produce and benefit from crops. Abundance and relief from famine, however, are not permanent components of the verb ʿaṣara. They emerge from its relationship with the preceding years and the expression yughāthu al-nās.

4. Iʿṣār: a whirlwind and its destructive force

Al-Baqarah 2:266

أَيَوَدُّ أَحَدُكُمْ أَنْ تَكُونَ لَهُ جَنَّةٌ مِنْ نَخِيلٍ وَأَعْنَابٍ تَجْرِي مِنْ تَحْتِهَا الْأَنْهَارُ لَهُ فِيهَا مِنْ كُلِّ الثَّمَرَاتِ وَأَصَابَهُ الْكِبَرُ وَلَهُ ذُرِّيَّةٌ ضُعَفَاءُ فَأَصَابَهَا إِعْصَارٌ فِيهِ نَارٌ فَاحْتَرَقَتْ ۗ كَذَٰلِكَ يُبَيِّنُ اللَّهُ لَكُمُ الْآيَاتِ لَعَلَّكُمْ تَتَفَكَّرُونَ

“Would any of you wish to have a garden of date palms and grapevines, with rivers flowing beneath it and fruit of every kind for him in it, while old age has overtaken him and he has weak descendants, and then a whirlwind containing fire strikes the garden and it burns? Thus The God makes the signs clear to you, so that you may reflect.”

Iʿṣār in Arabic

إِعْصَار (iʿṣār) is used in Arabic for a strong wind that stirs up dust and lifts it in a rotating movement or column. This is close to what we now call a whirlwind or rotating column of wind and dust.

Lexicons sometimes apply iʿṣār to the strong wind itself and sometimes to the dust raised by such movement. Descriptions of dust rising like a column also occur in explanations of the word.

The established meaning of iʿṣār does not inherently include fire. In Al-Baqarah 2:266, فِيهِ نَارٌ (fīhi nārun), “in which there is fire,” adds fire to the whirlwind being described.

“A fiery whirlwind” can therefore be a fluent rendering of the whole expression iʿṣārun fīhi nārun. When translating iʿṣār alone, however, “whirlwind” is more appropriate.

The verse also does not allow us to identify the exact weather phenomenon according to modern scientific classifications. It presents a clear image of destructive rotating wind containing fire that burns the garden.

The whirlwind’s role in the Qur’anic example

The garden’s owner is in circumstances that make its destruction especially devastating. It contains date palms, grapes, flowing rivers, and all kinds of fruit. The owner has reached old age and has weak descendants. At precisely this point, a whirlwind containing fire strikes and burns it.

The image’s force depends on these connected details. The issue is not merely the whirlwind’s intensity, but the destruction of something on which a person relies at a time of need.

The surrounding verses concern spending, the value of deeds, and the danger of losing the fruits of human effort. The burned garden thus provides an example through which to reflect on losing something valuable at a critical moment.

This ethical message is not the lexical meaning of iʿṣār. The root and word form identify rotating wind; its role in the analogy emerges from the full sentence and its connection with the preceding verses.

Was iʿṣār formed from the meaning “pressing”?

One can imagine a resemblance between intense, compressed wind movement and pressure. Such a resemblance is insufficient, however, to establish the word’s historical origin.

Lexical explanations chiefly identify iʿṣār through the stirring and rotation of dust. This usage should be understood as recorded, rather than being turned into “pressing life,” “compressed destiny,” or “extracting the essence of wealth.”

Literary language may create such connections, but they are not part of the word’s Qur’anic definition.

5. Muʿṣirāt: rain-bearing clouds or winds that bring rain?

Al-Nabaʾ 78:14

وَأَنْزَلْنَا مِنَ الْمُعْصِرَاتِ مَاءً ثَجَّاجًا

“And from the rain-bearing clouds We sent down water pouring abundantly.”

This is an important and debated Qur’anic occurrence of the root.

The morphology of muʿṣirāt

الْمُعْصِرَات (al-muʿṣirāt) is the feminine plural of the active participle مُعْصِرَة (muʿṣirah), from Form IV, أَعْصَرَ (aʿṣara). An active participle should not be confused with a passive construction or passive participle: “clouds that have been squeezed” is not a direct rendering of this morphology.

Nor should it immediately be taken to mean “things that squeeze something.” Some uses of the Arabic Form IV pattern can indicate reaching a time or approaching a particular state.

For example, early lexical usage records أَعْصَرَتِ الْجَارِيَةُ (aʿṣarati al-jāriyah) for a girl approaching or entering puberty. It concerns reaching a stage of development, rather than squeezing an object.

On this basis, some Arabic explanations connect muʿṣirāt with clouds that have reached the stage of raining: the cloud is conceived as full of rainwater, with the time for its release having arrived.

This establishes an intelligible relationship between the word’s morphology and rain, but it is not the only interpretation proposed.

First interpretation: clouds ready to rain

On this interpretation, al-muʿṣirāt denotes clouds heavy with rainwater and ready to release it.

The preposition مِنْ (min), “from,” in مِنَ الْمُعْصِرَاتِ (mina al-muʿṣirāti) fits this meaning clearly: the water is said to be sent down from the muʿṣirāt.

Other Qur’anic verses also describe the relationship between clouds and rainfall, for example Al-Rūm 30:48. This Qur’anic network, together with min, supports the interpretation “rain-bearing clouds.”

Accordingly, muʿṣirāt can be rendered “clouds ready to rain” or “rain-bearing clouds.”

This does not establish that the Qur’an is explaining a particular scientific process in which clouds are physically squeezed to extract their water. Such imagery may assist a lexical explanation, but the verse does not describe the exact process by which raindrops form.

Second interpretation: winds that bring clouds to rain

Early lexical and exegetical explanations also apply muʿṣirāt to winds: winds that drive clouds and play a role in their rainfall.

This deserves consideration because other verses, including Al-Aʿrāf 7:57 and Al-Rūm 30:48, describe winds stirring and moving clouds.

In this case, however, min needs further explanation. Rain normally falls from clouds, rather than from wind itself. This interpretation therefore requires understanding min in relation to the cause or indirect source of the rainfall.

That possibility is not linguistically impossible, but clouds fit the sentence’s direct construction more readily.

Third interpretation: rain-giving skies

Some older explanations also identify muʿṣirāt with the skies. This connects with the general image of rain descending from above, but provides less direct support for explaining the particular form muʿṣirāt than the preceding two interpretations.

Arabic also records other uses of مُعْصِر (muʿṣir) and muʿṣirāt; they should not all be restricted to one meaning.

Taken together, the evidence makes “rain-bearing clouds” a preferable translation for Al-Nabaʾ 78:14. Nevertheless, the possibility of rain-bringing winds should remain on record in lexical discussion. The word’s referent should not be presented as entirely undisputed.

Which word conveys abundant water?

The same verse contains مَاءً ثَجَّاجًا (māʾan thajjājan). ثَجَّاج (thajjāj) relates to water pouring and flowing copiously and repeatedly.

Thus, when the translation says “water pouring abundantly,” that meaning comes from thajjāj and the sentence’s construction, rather than from the root ʿ ṣ r itself.

On the preferred interpretation, muʿṣirāt identifies clouds ready to rain, while thajjāj describes how the water pours down.

This distinction keeps the root’s meaning separate from the accompanying descriptions.

6. Wa-l-ʿaṣr: an oath by time

Al-ʿAṣr 103:1

وَالْعَصْرِ

“By time.”

This is the shortest Qur’anic occurrence of the root, but its semantic field differs substantially from those concerning the extraction of juice.

Does ʿaṣr mean time or an age here?

In Arabic, الْعَصْر (al-ʿaṣr) can refer to time or an age. “By time” is therefore lexically defensible.

Another interpretation connects it with the latter part of the day or the afternoon. That meaning is also recognized in Arabic.

The syntax of وَالْعَصْرِ (wa-l-ʿaṣri) alone does not determine whether it means all time, a particular era, or the afternoon. The chapter’s context and linguistic usage need to be considered.

The following verse reads:

Al-ʿAṣr 103:2

إِنَّ الْإِنْسَانَ لَفِي خُسْرٍ

“Indeed, the human being is in loss.”

Al-ʿAṣr 103:3

إِلَّا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا وَعَمِلُوا الصَّالِحَاتِ وَتَوَاصَوْا بِالْحَقِّ وَتَوَاصَوْا بِالصَّبْرِ

“Except those who have faith, do righteous deeds, and counsel one another to truth and counsel one another to steadfastness.”

The oath by ʿaṣr is connected with a broad judgment about humanity. The chapter does not merely describe one historical group or an event at a particular hour. It states human loss and then identifies those excepted from that judgment.

The general meaning “time” or “an age” therefore fits the breadth of the chapter’s message.

This fit does not make the use of ʿaṣr for part of the day lexically incorrect. The point is that restricting the oath to a particular hour requires a clearer indication than these verses themselves provide.

“By time” is consequently the primary proposal for the basic translation. “By the course of time” can convey a similar temporal meaning with a different literary colouring.

Does ʿaṣr mean time that squeezes human beings?

The similarity between al-ʿaṣr, “time,” and ʿaṣr, “pressing,” may suggest an image of time placing people under pressure or squeezing out the essence of their lives.

That is a conceivable literary image, but should not be treated as the established lexical meaning of al-ʿaṣr.

Arabic has an independent and recognized temporal use of ʿaṣr. The chapter also contains no explicit verb or contextual indication connecting the oath directly with squeezing something.

Renderings such as “by time being compressed,” “by the extract of a lifetime,” or “by the pressure that shapes life” therefore lack sufficient support for a basic translation.

The passage of time and the loss of opportunities can be considered when reflecting on the oath’s relationship with خُسْر (khusr), loss. They should not, however, be equated with the lexical meaning of ʿaṣr.

Does it mean the afternoon prayer?

صَلَاةُ الْعَصْر (ṣalāt al-ʿaṣr) is a familiar religious expression for the afternoon prayer. The expression itself does not occur in the Qur’an.

The chapter Al-ʿAṣr also contains no occurrence of صَلَاة (ṣalāh), prayer. Its opening verse says only wa-l-ʿaṣr.

The word alone therefore cannot establish that the oath certainly concerns the afternoon prayer. That interpretation requires an argument beyond the expression’s direct meaning.

The temporal sense of ʿaṣr, whether time generally or part of a day, provides a more appropriate starting point for examining this verse.

7. The branches of the root: one origin or several independent meanings?

One difficulty with this root is that its meanings do not all fit easily under one short definition.

Arabic lexical tradition has sometimes examined this family under three main branches: time and a period; pressing to extract liquid; and seeking refuge or holding fast to something.

This division shows that there is no need to force every usage back to one material image.

Clearer connections

The relationship of عَصَرَ (ʿaṣara) with عَصِير (ʿaṣīr), عُصَارَة (ʿuṣārah), and مَعْصَرَة (maʿṣarah) is clear. All concern pressing and obtaining a substance from something.

The extension from pressing to obtaining and extracting is also recognizable, although the precise use of each form requires separate examination.

For muʿṣirāt, the connection with rain can be explained through clouds ready to release water, or winds that bring clouds to rain.

For iʿṣār, the intense movement of wind and dust is an established meaning that also fits the verse’s image of destruction.

Connections requiring caution

The historical connection between ʿaṣr, “time,” and ʿaṣr, “pressing,” is unclear. Explanations may be proposed to bring them closer, but neither should be presented as the certain origin of the other without sufficient linguistic evidence.

Likewise, recording seeking refuge and holding fast within this family does not itself justify translating the oath in Al-ʿAṣr as an oath by a refuge. For Yūsuf 12:49, sources do propose deliverance, but preferring it to pressing requires an independent contextual argument.

Each branch should be recognized through its own evidence. A shared root does not necessarily make all historical and Qur’anic usages identical in meaning.

9. Translation proposals for Forqan

For أَعْصِرُ (aʿṣiru) in Yūsuf 12:36, “I press” is the appropriate basic equivalent. An explanation can say, “I press grapes to make wine.” A direct translation should still make clear that the Arabic text contains خَمْر (khamr), wine, rather than عِنَب (ʿinab), grapes.

For يَعْصِرُونَ (yaʿṣirūna) in Yūsuf 12:49, “they extract juice” or “they press [produce]” is proposed. Since no object is stated, the basic translation should avoid making a particular product certain.

For إِعْصَار (iʿṣār) in Al-Baqarah 2:266, “whirlwind” is appropriate. The complete expression إِعْصَارٌ فِيهِ نَارٌ (iʿṣārun fīhi nārun) can be rendered “a whirlwind in which there is fire.” “A fiery whirlwind” is also a fluent rendering of the whole expression, rather than the independent meaning of iʿṣār.

For الْمُعْصِرَات (al-muʿṣirāt) in Al-Nabaʾ 78:14, “rain-bearing clouds” or “clouds ready to rain” is proposed. The possibility of rain-bringing winds should remain in the lexical explanation, while the basic translation selects a clear interpretation.

For الْعَصْر (al-ʿaṣr) in Al-ʿAṣr 103:1, “time” is the most suitable general equivalent. “The course of time” is also defensible. “The afternoon” is a linguistically possible interpretation, but should not be treated as the verse’s sole meaning without strong contextual support.

Translating every derivative with “pressing” is incorrect. The verb in Yūsuf denotes pressing, while al-ʿaṣr in Al-ʿAṣr denotes time and iʿṣār names a whirlwind.

10. Conclusion

The Arabic root ʿ ṣ r has several recognized semantic fields: pressing and extracting liquid; time and an age; a whirlwind; and, in some lexical usages, taking refuge or holding fast.

The Qur’an contains five occurrences. The verb for pressing appears twice in Yūsuf; iʿṣār once in Al-Baqarah denotes a destructive whirlwind; muʿṣirāt once in Al-Nabaʾ concerns rainfall; and al-ʿaṣr occurs once in the opening oath of Al-ʿAṣr.

In Yūsuf, pressing relates to work and produce. In Al-Nabaʾ, the preferred reading identifies muʿṣirāt as clouds ready to rain. In Al-Baqarah, iʿṣār is a rotating, destructive phenomenon. In Al-ʿAṣr, the word concerns time, a meaning that should not be turned into squeezing life or extracting its essence without evidence.

Some connections, such as pressing and extracting juice, are clear. But not every usage in the family can confidently be explained through one original image. This caution helps preserve established Arabic meanings and prevents literary or philosophical interpretations from replacing lexical evidence.

For Forqan, the definition should retain several branches: In material usage, ʿaṣr is pressing to draw out liquid; in temporal usage, it denotes time or an age; and in forms concerning wind and rain, each derivative’s particular meaning must be recognized from its morphology and context. This preserves the family’s actual range and prevents one meaning from being imposed on every verse.