The Qur’anic Root J S M

Discuss this work on Tabsira

Jism: the perceptible body, bodily size, and the distinction between appearance and human character or ability

Qur’anic and lexical forms

1. Introducing the root and its Qur’anic forms

The triliteral Arabic root J S M concerns bodies and perceptible physical structure. Jism names human and animal bodies and, more broadly, things with corporeal form and dimensions. Related jasīm describes bulk, jasāmah size or stoutness, and tajassama can concern growing large, acquiring bodily form, or undertaking the main part of a task.

Having a body differs from being large-bodied. Jism names the body; jasīm describes its size. A body need not therefore be large, strong, or fat.

The Qur’an uses jism once for Saul alongside knowledge, and ajsām once for hypocrites whose bodies impress an observer.

Both concern human bodies and appearance, but their contextual assessments differ. Saul’s increased knowledge and bodily capacity answer objections to his leadership; Al-Munāfiqūn places impressive bodies alongside condemned conduct. Brief root meaning: The body and physical structure; size and bulk are expressed through derivatives or accompanying descriptions.

J S M occurs twice in the Qur’an:

  • Wa-al-jismi in Al-Baqarah 2:247: the definite singular, “and the body” or “and physique.”
  • Ajsāmuhum in Al-Munāfiqūn 63:4: the plural of jism with an attached pronoun, “their bodies.”

Jasuma, jasīm, jasāmah, and tajassama do not occur in the Qur’an.

Quranic Arabic Corpus: two occurrences

The broader Arabic family nevertheless includes perceptible bodies, physical bulk, and figurative greatness or importance.

2. The semantic core in early Arabic

Gathering and perceptible structure

Ibn Fāris writes in Maqāyīs al-Lughah:

الْجِيمُ وَالسِّينُ وَالْمِيمُ يَدُلُّ عَلَى تَجَمُّعِ الشَّيْءِ.

al-jīmu wa-al-sīnu wa-al-mīmu yadullu ʿalā tajammuʿi al-shayʾ

Translation: “Jīm, sīn, and mīm indicate something gathering together.”

Ibn Fāris, Maqāyīs: gathering

Quoting Ibn Durayd, he then connects jism with a perceptible entity and jasīm with something physically large.

Kullu shakhṣin mudrakin means a perceivable body, rather than an entity necessarily possessing reason or awareness.

Perceiving and being perceived differ. A body can be an object of perception without itself having human cognition.

Gathering here concerns parts forming a coherent, recognizable physical structure.

The human body comprises different organs and parts, yet ordinary language calls the whole one body.

This fits jism without making every gathering, from crowds to collections of ideas, a jism.

An etymological account of gathering does not equate all its instances with the noun jism.

The body and its members

Lisān al-ʿArab states:

الْجِسْمُ: جَمَاعَةُ الْبَدَنِ أَوِ الْأَعْضَاءِ مِنَ النَّاسِ وَالْإِبِلِ وَالدَّوَابِّ.

al-jismu jamāʿatu al-badani awi al-aʿḍāʾi mina al-nāsi wa-al-ibili wa-al-dawābb

Translation: “Jism is the body or members taken together, of humans, camels, and other beasts.”

Lisān al-ʿArab: body and members together

Ordinary Arabic therefore does not confine it to humans.

Camels, horses, and other animals have bodies whose size, bulk, leanness, and qualities can be described.

Here jism concerns the whole frame, rather than just one member.

A hand, head, or foot can be part of a body without being identical to the whole.

Bodies can be large or small, healthy or ill, strong or weak; none of those qualities alone defines the general noun.

Jism should therefore not invariably become “strong body” or “massive frame.”

Is a jism necessarily large?

Size matters to this family’s derivatives, but jism and jasīm require distinction.

Lisān states:

وَقَدْ جَسُمَ الشَّيْءُ، أَيْ عَظُمَ، فَهُوَ جَسِيمٌ.

wa-qad jasuma al-shayʾu ay ʿaẓuma fa-huwa jasīm

Translation: “Something jasuma, became large, and is therefore jasīm.”

Ṣiḥāḥ and Lisān: jism and jasīm

Jasuma here concerns becoming large or increasing in bulk.

Jasīm highlights size; jism names the body itself.

Lean and stout people both have bodies, differing in size and qualities.

In Al-Baqarah 2:247, expansion follows from basṭatan fī al-jismi, rather than jism inherently meaning greatness.

Body and physical dimensions

Al-Rāghib defines jism through length, width, and depth in Al-Mufradāt.

This matters when considering a body as dimensional reality.

A three-dimensional thing occupies space and may divide into smaller parts that remain corporeal.

Al-Rāghib uses this to distinguish jism from shakhṣ: divided bodily parts remain bodies, but a particular recognizable entity no longer retains the same unity when cut apart.

Al-Rāghib: jism and shakhṣ

The distinction is intelligible, but three-dimensional definitions also belong to philosophical and scientific discussion.

Later accounts of substance, accident, natural body, and mathematical body should not automatically be attributed to the Qur’an’s first audience.

Both Qur’anic occurrences concern human bodies; understanding them requires no complete philosophical system of matter and dimensions.

3. Important Arabic forms and derivatives

Jism and its plurals

Jism is the family’s principal noun.

Its familiar plurals are ajsām and jusūm.

Only ajsāmuhum occurs in the Qur’an; both plurals are recorded elsewhere for bodies.

Their different plural patterns do not establish entirely different meanings without evidence.

Jusmān

Jusmān names the human body or complete frame in lexical sources.

Abū Zayd and Al-Aṣmaʿī report overlap between jism, jusmān, and jasad in some uses.

Naḥīf al-jusmān describes someone lean-bodied.

The form illustrates the family’s range in describing bodily structure and appearance.

Jusmān should not be merged etymologically with juthmān from J TH M, despite semantic overlap in some sources.

Lisān: jusmān and juthmān

Jasuma and jasāmah

Jasuma is Form I, with imperfect yajsumu.

Jasāmah is its verbal noun, meaning size, bulk, or stoutness.

It concerns bodily largeness, rather than merely having a body.

A person jasuma when their frame becomes large or stout.

The verb alone does not identify muscle, fat, natural growth, or another cause.

The referent and context determine the kind of largeness.

Jasīm and jusām

Jasīm describes something large or bulky.

Jusām, with ḍammah on jīm, is also recorded with a similar meaning.

Both can describe large-bodied humans or animals.

Jasīm also extends to nonphysical magnitude or importance: a great matter, weighty event, or major responsibility.

Magnitude remains, while bodily size is no longer the subject.

Jisām and ajsam

Jisām, with kasrah on jīm, is the plural of jasīm.

Ajsam is an elative: larger or bulkier.

It can compare bodily size or the greatness and prominence of something else.

Early poetry also uses it for high rank or standing.

Each occurrence therefore requires distinguishing physical size from importance or status.

Jassama and tajsīm

Jassama is recorded for making corporeal or enlarging; its verbal noun is tajsīm.

Modern tajsīm also occurs in art, geometry, and three-dimensional representation.

Making a three-dimensional model or giving a shape physical representation can be called tajsīm.

These technical and artistic uses should not define Qur’anic jism directly.

Tajassama

Tajassama has several recorded uses.

One concerns becoming corporeal or large.

Another involves selecting someone from a group.

Tajassamtu fulānan min bayni al-qawmi means choosing a particular person from among the people.

Lexicographers explain it as directing attention toward that person’s body among other bodies.

Early tajassama therefore exceeds the familiar modern sense of becoming embodied.

Undertaking the major part of a task

Ibn al-Sikkīt records another use.

Tajassamtu al-amra can mean undertaking a matter’s major, weighty, or difficult part.

Tajassamtu al-ramla wa-al-jabala concerns traversing or climbing the main bulk of sand or mountain.

The subject’s magnitude and difficulty are prominent.

Some lexical reports bring tajassamtu al-amra close to tajashshamtuhu, undertaking a difficult task.

This overlap does not merge J S M with J SH M.

4. Pre-Islamic Arabic usage

Greatness and precedence in ʿĀmir ibn al-Ṭufayl

ʿĀmir ibn al-Ṭufayl, the well-known pre-Islamic poet and warrior, describes his people’s standing in a poem attributed to him.

One transmitted reading is:

لَقَدْ عَلِمَ الْحَيُّ مِنْ عَامِرٍ
بِأَنَّ لَنَا ذِرْوَةَ الْأَجْسَمِ

laqad ʿalima al-ḥayyu min ʿĀmirin / bi-anna lanā dhirwata al-ajsami

Translation: “The people of ʿĀmir know that the highest and greatest standing belongs to us.”

Dhirwah names a summit or highest point.

Ajsam concerns magnitude and prominence; together, in tribal praise, they evoke high standing.

The witness extends ajsam beyond bodily size to greatness and precedence.

The wording is nevertheless disputed.

Al-Jawharī’s Al-Ṣiḥāḥ has bi-anna lanā al-dhirwata al-ajsamā; Al-Ṣaghānī prefers dhirwata al-ajsami with a genitive rhyme. The opening in Ṣiḥāḥ and Lisān is laqad ʿalima, while Tāj also has fa-qad ʿalima. The quoted opening therefore replaces the supplied wa-qad with laqad, following Ṣiḥāḥ and Lisān.

Ṣiḥāḥ: laqad and variants of the poetic witness

The variant affects syntax and should not be concealed.

Both readings nevertheless retain magnitude and prominence in ajsam.

The witness helps explain extension to status without making social rank jism’s primary meaning.

A large-bodied animal

Lisān and Al-Ṣiḥāḥ quote this rajaz fragment:

أَنْعَتُ عَيْرًا سَهُوقًا جُسَامًا

anʿatu ʿayran sahūqan jusāmā

Translation: “I describe a wild ass, tall and large-bodied.”

Lisān: unnamed large-bodied animal witness

ʿAyr here refers to a wild ass.

Sahūq concerns height; jusām concerns bodily bulk.

The qualities are close without being identical: an animal can be tall and also bulky.

Their pairing shows height and bulk as distinguishable traits.

Jusām should not therefore always become merely “tall.” Context specifies its kind of largeness.

The examined transmission identifies neither poet nor date clearly; the fragment cannot confidently be called pre-Islamic.

It nevertheless documents describing a large-bodied animal.

Selecting an animal from a herd

Lexical sources also quote tajassama for selection:

تَجَسَّمَهُ مِنْ بَيْنِهِنَّ بِمُرْهَفٍ
لَهُ جَالِبٌ فَوْقَ الرِّصَافِ عَلِيلُ

tajassamahu min baynihinna bi-murhafin / lahu jālibun fawqa al-riṣāfi ʿalīlu

Translation: “He selected it from among them, with a slender, sharp point bearing a crust of blood above its bindings, repeatedly steeped in blood.” Abū Saʿīd explains jālib as a blood crust and ʿalīl through repeated blood-drenching. The description exceeds a mere trace of blood; ʿalīl here does not mean ill.

Abū Saʿīd: blood crust and repeated blood-drenching

Tajassamahu concerns selecting an animal from the group.

Murhaf describes the slender, sharp point; the other words qualify that implement. Riṣāf concerns bindings securing the point to the weapon’s shaft.

Abū Ḥanīfah al-Dīnawarī, Al-Nabāt: point bindings

Tajassama can therefore single out an individual from a collection.

This special sense should not govern every occurrence.

The examined transmission does not establish attribution or date, so it is not certain pre-Islamic evidence.

Elevated ground in Al-Akhṭal

Al-Akhṭal, an Umayyad poet, says:

فَمَا زَالَ يَسْقِي بَطْنَ خَبْتٍ وَعَرْعَرٍ
وَأَرْضَهُمَا حَتَّى اطْمَأَنَّ جَسِيمُهَا

fa-mā zāla yasqī baṭna Khabtin wa-ʿArʿarin / wa-arḍahumā ḥattā iṭmaʾanna jasīmuhā

Translation: “It continued watering the beds of Khabt and ʿArʿar and their surrounding ground, until even the higher parts were covered by water.” The lexical explanation identifies jasīm here as elevated land covered by water. Iṭmaʾanna should not establish an actual leveling of the terrain.

Lisān: Al-Akhṭal’s elevated land covered by water

Jasīm names the raised or prominent ground.

The image has water gathering lower down, then covering higher areas as it increases.

The adjective can thus concern land’s physical prominence.

Al-Akhṭal is post-Islamic; this is not a pre-Islamic witness.

The witnesses establish human and animal bodies, bulk, height, and sometimes nonphysical greatness. Each derivative and witness requires its own meaning and date.

5. Qur’anic usage in Saul’s story

Al-Baqarah 2:247: expansion in knowledge and body

وَقَالَ لَهُمْ نَبِيُّهُمْ إِنَّ اللَّهَ قَدْ بَعَثَ لَكُمْ طَالُوتَ مَلِكًا ۚ قَالُوا أَنَّىٰ يَكُونُ لَهُ الْمُلْكُ عَلَيْنَا وَنَحْنُ أَحَقُّ بِالْمُلْكِ مِنْهُ وَلَمْ يُؤْتَ سَعَةً مِّنَ الْمَالِ ۚ قَالَ إِنَّ اللَّهَ اصْطَفَاهُ عَلَيْكُمْ وَزَادَهُ بَسْطَةً فِي الْعِلْمِ وَالْجِسْمِ ۖ وَاللَّهُ يُؤْتِي مُلْكَهُ مَن يَشَاءُ ۚ وَاللَّهُ وَاسِعٌ عَلِيمٌ

wa-qāla lahum nabiyyuhum inna Allāha qad baʿatha lakum Ṭālūta malikan qālū annā yakūnu lahu al-mulku ʿalaynā wa-naḥnu aḥaqqu bi-al-mulki minhu wa-lam yuʾta saʿatan mina al-māli qāla inna Allāha iṣṭafāhu ʿalaykum wa-zādahu basṭatan fī al-ʿilmi wa-al-jismi wa-Allāhu yuʾtī mulkahu man yashāʾu wa-Allāhu wāsiʿun ʿalīm

Proposed translation based on this study: “Their prophet said: The God has appointed Saul king over you. They said: How can he rule us when we are more entitled to rule and he has not been granted abundant wealth? He said: The God has chosen him over you and increased him in knowledge and body. The God grants His rule to whomever He wills; The God is all-embracing and knowing.”

Al-jismi refers to Saul.

His opponents make two objections: their claimed greater entitlement and his lack of wealth.

Their prophet redirects attention to divine choice and increased knowledge and body.

Al-ʿilmi and al-jismi stand together.

The first concerns knowledge, the second bodily form and qualities.

The verse therefore identifies two different domains of ability or advantage.

Basṭatan fī al-jismi

Basṭah belongs to B S Ṭ, expansion and breadth.

Alongside al-jismi, it expresses increase in the bodily domain.

This can concern bodily size, stature, or greater physical capacity.

Early commentaries likewise emphasize Saul’s stature and strength.

Al-Ṭabarī: Saul’s stature and strength in context

The phrase alone provides no height, weight, muscular measurement, or other number.

Nor does it alone prove Saul taller or stronger than everyone in his community.

It describes bodily increase alongside knowledge, without quantifying the exact advantage.

“Greater physical capacity and qualities” can therefore explain the context; jism itself still means body.

Does jism mean military power?

The story concerns rule and later conflict, making physical capacity relevant to leadership and battle.

That connection should not make jism directly mean military power.

Military power can also depend on knowledge, planning, organization, experience, and other factors.

The verse specifically names knowledge and body.

Translation should preserve their distinction.

Al-jismi names the bodily dimension; the royal setting establishes its relevance here.

Knowledge and body in the prophet’s response

The opponents stress entitlement and wealth.

The response stresses divine choice and Saul’s knowledge and body.

The shift matters.

The verse does not deny wealth every role in governance; it rejects insufficient wealth as a decisive objection here.

It likewise makes neither every wealthy person unsuitable nor every large-bodied person fit to rule.

It concerns a particular chosen person with advantages in two specified domains.

Bodily traits form part of the response, rather than a universal, exclusive leadership criterion.

Two different kinds of advantage

Wa-zādahu basṭatan fī al-ʿilmi wa-al-jismi applies one noun, basṭah, to two domains.

Expansion in knowledge concerns understanding and cognitive capacity.

Bodily expansion concerns physical qualities and capacity.

The same word has different referents.

Increased knowledge should not become a larger brain, nor bodily expansion increased knowledge.

The verse places the domains together without merging their meanings.

Al-Munāfiqūn further clarifies the distinction: impressive appearance alone does not establish good character or conduct.

6. Qur’anic usage in Al-Munāfiqūn

Al-Munāfiqūn 63:4: impressive bodies

وَإِذَا رَأَيْتَهُمْ تُعْجِبُكَ أَجْسَامُهُمْ ۖ وَإِن يَقُولُوا تَسْمَعْ لِقَوْلِهِمْ ۖ كَأَنَّهُمْ خُشُبٌ مُّسَنَّدَةٌ ۖ يَحْسَبُونَ كُلَّ صَيْحَةٍ عَلَيْهِمْ ۚ هُمُ الْعَدُوُّ فَاحْذَرْهُمْ ۚ قَاتَلَهُمُ اللَّهُ ۖ أَنَّىٰ يُؤْفَكُونَ

wa-idhā raʾaytahum tuʿjibuka ajsāmuhum wa-in yaqūlū tasmaʿ li-qawlihim ka-annahum khushubun musannadatun yaḥsabūna kulla ṣayḥatin ʿalayhim humu al-ʿaduwwu fa-iḥdharhum qātalahumu Allāhu annā yuʾfakūn

Proposed translation based on this study: “When you see them, their bodies impress you; when they speak, you listen. They are like propped-up timbers, imagining every cry is against them. They are the enemy, so beware of them. May The God destroy them; how they are turned away from truth!”

Ajsāmuhum combines the plural of jism with a plural possessive pronoun.

The people discussed are hypocrites with striking outward qualities.

The verse moves from bodies and appearance to speech that attracts attention.

It then introduces khushubun musannadah, propped-up timbers.

The image accompanies their behavior and anxieties.

Tuʿjibuka ajsāmuhum: impressive appearance

Tuʿjibuka concerns impressing or attracting the addressee’s attention.

Ajsāmuhum is its subject: their bodies make the impression.

Ajsām lexically names bodies; its accompanying verb supplies their striking appearance.

Height, attractiveness, proportions, or bodily presence might contribute, but exact measurements and traits are unspecified.

Not everyone described can categorically be declared exceptionally tall, muscular, or beautiful.

The stated point is the bodies’ visual effect.

Jism itself means body; the accompanying verb supplies the impressiveness here.

Speech attracting attention

The verse then says:

“Wa-in yaqūlū tasmaʿ li-qawlihim.”

That is: “If they speak, you listen to what they say.”

This concerns their speech’s effect.

Striking bodies accompany speech that prompts attention.

The continuing verse distinguishes that appearance from conduct.

Appearance or speaking ability alone therefore cannot establish sincerity, knowledge, or moral fitness.

An attractive presence and effective speech do not settle truth or trustworthiness.

This is a contextual inference, rather than a lexical redefinition of jism as deceptive appearance.

Ka-annahum khushubun musannadah: propped-up timbers

After appearance and speech, the Qur’an introduces the comparison:

“Ka-annahum khushubun musannadah.”

The people resemble pieces of timber propped against something.

Timber may be large, tall, or impressive, without its being propped up supplying independent, aware action.

The image can contrast outward presence with a lack of inward firmness or capacity.

Literal properties and figurative meaning nevertheless require distinction.

The verse does not say their bodies are wooden or that they literally lack reason or life.

Ka-annahum signals comparison.

Ajsāmuhum therefore should not become “lifeless bodies” or “bodies empty of spirit” in the base translation.

Such expressions may explain an aspect of the image, but do not directly translate jism.

An imposing exterior and inner anxiety

The verse continues:

“Yaḥsabūna kulla ṣayḥatin ʿalayhim.”

That is: “They imagine every cry is against them.”

This concerns anxiety and reaction.

Their bodies and speech impress, yet surrounding cries and events prompt suspicion and worry.

Impressive appearance therefore need not accompany confidence, endurance, or steady conduct.

This does not make every anxious person or someone fearing danger a hypocrite.

The Qur’an describes a particular group within a particular context.

Fear alone does not establish hypocrisy.

Nor do bodily size or beauty. The criticism concerns the group’s conduct, rather than having a body or an impressive appearance.

Al-Ṭabarī: the group’s appearance, speech, and conduct

Does the body equal the whole human reality?

The verse illustrates the difference between bodily traits and the entirety of character and conduct.

The body is a real, observable part of human existence.

Sincerity, trustworthiness, knowledge, justice, and loyalty cannot be determined from bodily shape alone.

Speech, behavior, decisions, and practical responsibility also require examination.

This does not make the body irrelevant or valueless.

Al-Baqarah 2:247 places Saul’s bodily advantage alongside knowledge, showing its possible contextual importance.

The comparison establishes contextual value, rather than an invariably positive or negative meaning in jism itself.

8. Questions of understanding and translation

Does jism always mean a living body?

Its two Qur’anic occurrences describe living humans.

They do not make every Arabic jism exclusively living.

The broader definition concerns perceptible bodily structure; life is not settled by the word alone.

Broad philosophical definitions should likewise not be imposed on every early usage.

“Body” or “bodily dimension” suffices for these verses.

Does having a jism mean being large-bodied?

Jism names the body; jasīm describes its bulk.

Saul’s bodily advantage follows from basṭah in Al-Baqarah 2:247.

The impressive bodies of Al-Munāfiqūn 63:4 follow from tuʿjibuka.

Jism cannot therefore always be translated directly as a large frame.

Does a beautiful or powerful body establish moral superiority?

Jism itself carries neither positive nor negative moral value.

Saul’s bodily expansion appears alongside knowledge as an advantage.

Al-Munāfiqūn instead places impressive bodies alongside condemned conduct.

Bodily traits may help in particular circumstances without alone establishing sincerity, justice, or character.

Health and physical capacity are not thereby unimportant; their value and role require appropriate context.

Does ajsāmuhum mean deceptive appearances?

Ajsāmuhum means their bodies.

Their appearance impresses, but conduct does not match that exterior in the verse.

Analysis can therefore discuss appearance’s deceptiveness or insufficiency.

“Deceptive appearances” nevertheless does not lexically translate ajsām and should not replace it in the base text.

Can jism define self and awareness?

Jism denotes physical reality without fully defining awareness, choice, or nafs.

Bodies provide perceptible presence; awareness’s nature, its relation to the brain, and life after death require other evidence.

A dimensional body does not establish that every possible life or awareness must share this biological structure.

Conversely, ignorance of every possible life form does not prove a particular form of nonbodily life.

The study establishes the root’s lexical field of perceptible bodies.

Later theological and philosophical terminology

Jism acquired extensive technical uses in later philosophy and theology.

Debates developed around corporeality, matter, dimensions, substance, accident, and imperceptible beings.

Tajsīm and mujassamah also acquired theological and artistic uses.

This history matters to language change without becoming the root’s basic Qur’anic definition.

Both Qur’anic occurrences concern human bodies; neither alone supplies a philosophical system for all beings’ corporeality.

Later theological questions therefore require independent evidence, rather than imposing later terminology on these two occurrences.

9. Translation proposals for Forqan

The main natural Persian equivalents of jism are jism and badan, body.

Paykar, bodily form, or andām, physique or frame, can also fit.

Context should govern the choice.

Al-jismi in Al-Baqarah 2:247 concerns Saul’s bodily dimension.

Wa-zādahu basṭatan fī al-ʿilmi wa-al-jismi can be rendered:

“He has granted him greater breadth in knowledge and body.”

Physical capacity can explain this context, but jism alone should not become military power, height, or muscularity.

Ajsāmuhum in Al-Munāfiqūn 63:4 can be “their bodies” or Persian andāmhāyishān, their physiques.

Wa-idhā raʾaytahum tuʿjibuka ajsāmuhum naturally reads:

“When you see them, their bodies impress you.”

Persian andām is more fluent here because the sentence concerns visible appearance.

The root note should still identify ajsām as the plural of jism, without inherent beauty, deception, or bulk.

Non-Qur’anic derivatives require different equivalents.

Size-related jasuma means becoming large or bulky.

Jasīm can mean large-bodied, great, or important in nonphysical contexts.

Jasāmah concerns size and bulk.

Jusmān denotes the body or complete frame.

Ajsam is the elative, larger or bulkier.

Early tajassama can mean selecting someone or undertaking a matter’s major, difficult part; later usage can mean becoming corporeal.

These distinctions should remain; specialized derivatives should not define the two Qur’anic jism occurrences without evidence.

10. Conclusion

J S M concerns the perceptible body and physical structure.

Ibn Fāris’s gathering-and-coherence account helps explain a body’s form and dimensions without naming every gathering a jism.

Arabic sources apply jism to human and animal bodies. Jasuma and jasīm describe bulk, while early tajassama extends to selecting, traversing substantial terrain, or accepting difficult work.

Poetry likewise records ajsam for rank and jusām for animal bulk. Those emphasize magnitude without restricting jism itself to a large body.

The Qur’an uses the root twice.

Al-Baqarah 2:247 applies al-jismi to Saul alongside knowledge, contrasting the opponents’ financial objection with his stated advantages.

Al-Munāfiqūn 63:4 describes impressive bodies, while the following context shows appearance and effective speech insufficient to establish sincerity, confidence, or character.

Together, they establish a perceptible body whose value and role depend on context.

Physical capacity can matter alongside knowledge; impressive appearance cannot conceal misconduct in another setting.

Jism itself therefore names neither moral virtue nor corruption or hypocrisy.

Nor should it be equated without evidence with a corpse, soulless body, military power, or moral character.

Jism, badan, and contextually paykar or andām are Forqan’s main Persian equivalents. Jism preserves the direct sense in Al-Baqarah 2:247; andāmhāyishān naturally describes appearance in Al-Munāfiqūn 63:4.

The root’s core is bodily form and physical reality; size, bulk, beauty, ability, and moral value follow from particular derivatives, descriptions, and contexts.

Preserving that distinction allows both verses to be understood without unstated qualities or reducing human reality to outward appearance.